Implementation considerations provide a comparative assessment of how the interventions performed against important criteria difficult to capture in the quantitative analyses, including strength of evidence, equity, acceptability, feasibility and sustainability.

Given that the technical cost-effectiveness results are only one consideration in the decision making process, it is important to consider the league table results, along with the implementation considerations. The table is ordered based on the strength of evidence criteria followed by the equity criteria.

InterventionIntervention typeStrength of evidence - BMIStrength of evidence - PA/dietEquityAcceptability - GovernmentAcceptability - IndustryAcceptability - PublicFeasibilitySustainabilityICER (mean, $/HALY gained)
Community-based interventionsProgramHighN/ANeutralHighHighHighMediumMedium$8,155
Financial incentives for weight loss by private health insurersProgramHighN/ANegativeHighMediumMediumHighMedium$7,376
School-based intervention to reduce sedentary behaviourProgramMediumMediumPositiveHighHighHighHighMediumDominant
School-based intervention to increase physical activity ProgramMediumMediumPositiveHighHighHighHighMediumDominant
Reformulation in response to the Health Star Rating system (voluntary)RegulatoryLowMediumPositiveHighMediumHighHighMedium$1,728
Restricting television advertising of unhealthy foods (mandatory)RegulatoryLowMediumPositiveMediumLowHighHighHighDominant
Reformulation to reduce sugar in sugar sweetened beverages (voluntary)RegulatoryLowMediumPositiveHighMediumMediumHighMediumDominant
Menu kilojoule labelling on fast foodRegulatoryLowMediumNeutralHighMediumHighHighHighDominant
Supermarket shelf tags on healthier products (voluntary)ProgramLowMediumNeutralHighMediumHighHighMediumDominant
Workplace intervention to reduce sedentary behaviourProgramLowMediumNeutralHighMediumHighMediumLow$28,703
Sugar-sweetened beverages tax (20%)RegulatoryLowMediumNeutralMediumLowMediumHighHighDominant
Alcohol price increase: uniform volumetric taxRegulatoryLowMediumNegativeMediumLowLowHighHighDominant
Package size cap on sugar-sweetened beverages (mandatory)RegulatoryLowLowPositiveLowLowLowLowMediumDominant
National mass media campaign related to sugar-sweetened beveragesProgramLowLowNeutralMediumMediumMediumHighMediumDominant
Fuel excise: 10c per litre increaseRegulatoryLowLowNegativeLowMediumLowHighHigh$7,684
Restrictions on price promotions of sugar-sweetened beverages (mandatory)RegulatoryLowLowNegativeLowLowLowLowHighDominant
Notes: BMI: body mass index; HALY: health adjusted life year; ICER: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; PA: physical activity; The willingness-to-pay threshold for this analysis is $50,000 per health adjusted life year. Dominant: the intervention is both cost-saving and improves health.